The Exemplary Rhetor: On Anti-Philosophy and Sophistics in Alain Badiou

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56550/d.2.2.4

Keywords:

Rhetoric, Alain Badiou, Sophistics, Anti-Philosophy, Exemplarity

Abstract

This article investigates the ambiguous status of rhetoric, situated between proper philosophy and mere sophistry, through Alan Badiou’s three exemplary figures of thought: the philosopher, the anti-philosopher, and the sophist. With the recent return of the sophist in politics in the form of populist politicians, contemporary rhetorical studies have expressed a need for the discipline to reconsider its alliance with relativist sophistics. However, by studying Badiou’s three exemplary figures, and relating them to his understanding of the three forms of negation, the article explores a possible rift between sophistical rhetoric and anti-philosophical populism that complicates prevalent understandings of the relationship between rhetoric, philosophy, and sophistics. Finally, the article brings up some issues concerning how to fit exemplarity in general, and the three exemplary figures in particular, into the framework of Badiou’s entire philosophy and discusses how to potentially counteract these limitations.

References

Aristotle, 2006. On rhetoric: a theory of civic discourse, 2. ed. ed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

Badiou, A., 2019. Two weeks after the election of Trump, in: Trump. Polity, Cambridge, pp. 26–68.

Badiou, A., 2018a. Can politics be thought? followed by of an obscure disaster, on the end of the truth of the state. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.

Badiou, A., 2018b. Lacan. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

Badiou, A., 2017a. Conditions. Bloomsbury Academic, London.

Badiou, A., 2017b. Formulas of “L’Étourdit,” in: Spitzer, S., Reinhard, K. (Trans.), There’s No Such Thing as a Sexual Relationship: Two Lessons on Lacan. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, pp. 45–62.

Badiou, A., 2015a. Theoretical writings. Bloomsbury Academic, London.

Badiou, A., 2015b. Nietzsche: L’antiphilosophie I, 1992-1993. Fayard, Paris.

Badiou, A., 2012. The adventure of French philosophy. Verso, London.

Badiou, A., 2011. Wittgenstein’s antiphilosophy. Verso, London.

Badiou, A., 2009. Logics of worlds: being and event, 2. Continuum, London.

Badiou, A., 2008. The three negations. Cardozo Law Review 29, 1877–1883.

Badiou, A., 2001. Who is Nietzsche? Pli 1–11.

Badiou, A., 2000. Deleuze: the clamor of being, Theory out of bounds. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn.

Badiou, A., 1999. Manifesto for philosophy: followed by two essays: “The (re)turn of philosophy itself” and “Definition of philosophy,”. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

Badiou, A., Cassin, B., 2019. Homme, femme, philosophie. Fayard, Paris.

Biesecker, B., 1992. Michel Foucault and the Question of Rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric 25, 351–364.

Biesecker, B.A., 2018. Guest Editor’s Introduction: Toward an Archaeogenealogy of Post-truth. Philosophy & Rhetoric 51, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.51.4.0329

Bosteels, B., 2011. Translator’s introduction, in: Wittgenstein’s Antiphilosophy. Verso, London, pp. 1–66.

Bosteels, B., 2008. Radical antiphilosophy. Filozofski vestnik XXIX, 155–187.

Burke, K., 2013. A rhetoric of motives. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.

Canovan, M., 1999. Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies 47, 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184

Cassin, B., 2017. Ab-sense, or Lacan from A to D, in: Spitzer, S., Reinhard, K. (Trans.), There’s No Such Thing as a Sexual Relationship: Two Lessons on Lacan. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, pp. 3–44.

Cassin, B., 1992. Qui a peur de la sophistique? Contre l’ethical correctness. Le Débat 5, 49–60.

Cassin, B., 1990. Bonnes et mauvaises rhétoriques, de Platon à Perelman, in: Meyer, M., Lempereur, A. (Eds.), Figures et conflits rhétoriques. Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Brussels, pp. 17–38.

Clemens, J., Bartlett, A.J., 2012. “The greatest of our dead”: Badiou and Lacan, in: Bowden, S., Duffy, S.B. (Eds.), Badiou and Philosophy, Critical Connections. Edinburgh university press, Edinburgh, pp. 177–202.

Daniel, J.R., 2016. The Event That We Are: Ontology, Rhetorical Agency, and Alain Badiou. Philosophy & Rhetoric 49, 254–276. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.49.3.0254

Deleuze, G., 1990. The logic of sense. Columbia University Press, New York.

Feltham, O., 2008. Alain Badiou: live theory. Continuum, London.

Fiorovanti, D., 2012. Badiou versus Derrida: Truth, Sets, and Sopistry. The Philosophical Forum 43, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9191.2011.00410.x

Fuller, S., 2017. The Post-Truth About Philosophy and Rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric 50, 473. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.50.4.0473

Gaonkar, D.P., 1990. Rhetoric and its double: Reflections on the rhetorical turn in the human sciences, in: Simons, H.W. (Ed.), The Rhetorical Turn: Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of Inquiry. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., pp. 341–366.

Hallward, P., 2003. Badiou: a subject to truth. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn.

Jarratt, S.C., 1991. Rereading the sophists: classical rhetoric refigured. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Ill.

Johnston, A., 2010. This philosophy which is not one: Jean- Claude Milner, Alain Badiou, and Lacanian anti-philosophy. S: Journal of the Jan van Eyck Circle for Lacanian Ideology Critique 3, 137–158.

Lacan, J., n.d. Le séminaire, XII: Problèmes cruciaux pour la psychanalyse, 1964-1965. unpublished.

Livingston, P.M., 2012. The politics of logic: Badiou, Wittgenstein, and the consequences of formalism. Routledge, New York, NY.

Mácha, J., 2023. The philosophy of exemplarity: singularity, particularity, and self-reference. Routledge, New York, NY.

McComiskey, B., 2017. Post-truth rhetoric and composition. Utah State University Press, Logan, Ut.

McComiskey, B., 2012. Gorgias and the new sophistic rhetoric. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Ill.

Myres, 2018. Post-truth as Symptom: The Emergence of a Masculine Hysteria. Philosophy & Rhetoric 51, 392. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.51.4.0392

Norris, C., 2012. Sophist or Antiphilosopher? Journal of Critical Realism 11, 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcr.v11i4.487

Papastephanou, M., 2020. The Philosopher, the Sophist, the Undercurrent and Alain Badiou, in: Gokey, T., Gironi, F., Ennis, P.J., Austin, M. (Eds.), Speculations II. Punctum Books, Earth, Milky Way, pp. 49–85.

Perelman, C., 1982. The realm of rhetoric. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Ind.

Plato, 2006. Sophist, in: Fowler, H.N. (Tran.), Plato: In Twelve Volumes, Vol. 7: Theaetetus. Sophist. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 259–460.

Poulakos, J., 1995. Sophistical rhetoric in classical Greece. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C.

Ruda, F., 2015. For Badiou: idealism without idealism, Diaeresis. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Ill.

Scott, B., Forth. The Rhetoricity of Philosophy: Audience in Perelman and Ricoeur after the Badiou-Cassin Debate. Routledge, London.

Stagnell, A., 2020. Slavoj Žižek and Dialectical Sophistics - On the Relationship Between Dialectical Philosophy and Philosophical Rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric 53, 134–156. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.2.0134

Werner, J., 2019. Ja skiter i att det är fejk det är förjävligt ändå: om myter på nätet, fejkade berättelser och vikten av källkritik. Albert Bonniers Förlag.

Zeller, E., 1881. A history of Greek philosophy: from the earliest period to the time of Socrates, vol. II. Longmans, Green, and co., London.

Žižek, S., 2020. Hegel in a wired brain. Bloomsbury Academic, London.

Žižek, S., 2012. Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. Verso, London.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-18