Operationalism, Science and Technology

Authors

  • Marco Buzzoni University of Macerata

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56550/d.3.1.1

Keywords:

Agazzi, Bridgman, Discovery/Justification Distinction, Operationalism, Relationship between Science and Technology

Abstract

Bridgman’s operationalism incurred serious difficulties, and this fact induced many authors to dismiss operationalism per se. Developed beginning in the late 1960s, Agazzi’s operationalism escaped these difficulties from the beginning, but the persistence in it of a traditional primacy attributed to theory over experiment led him to pose an opposition between science and technique that was inconsistent with the general operationalist framework of his philosophy of science. Later, Agazzi sought to make his operationalism more coherent by moving toward a closer relationship between science and technology, that is, toward an intermediate solution which sees them as interacting with one another. However, in order to coherently defend an intermediate solution, it is not enough to find a certain set of properties that would be peculiar to science but not to technique, or vice versa. Rather, it is necessary to specify two distinct (but also complementary) points of view, from which science and technique can appear, at the same time but without contradiction, both as conceptually distinct and as indistinguishable as historical-empirical realities: in one sense, science is irreducible from technology, but in the other sense, they coincide completely.

References

Agazzi E. 1969. Temi e problemi di filosofia della fisica. Abete, Rom.

Agazzi E. 1976. Criteri epistemologici fondamentali delle discipline psicologiche. In G. Siri (ed), Problemi epistemologici della psicologia, pp. 3-35. Vita e Pensiero, Milan.

Agazzi E. 1978. Les critères sémantiques pour la constitution de l’objet scientifique. In: M. Bunge (ed), La sémantique dans les sciences. pp. 13-29. Beauchesne, Paris.

Agazzi E. 1985a. Commensurability, Incommensurability, and Cumulativity in Scientific Knowledge. Erkenntnis 22, 51-77.

Agazzi E. 1985b. Gli strumenti e l’oggettività scientifica. Epistemologia. An Italian Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8, 3-14.

Agazzi E. 1989. Naive Realism and Naive Antirealism. Dialectica 43, pp. 83-98.

Agazzi E. 1992[2004]. Il bene, il male e la scienza. Milan: Rusconi. English edition: Agazzi, E. 2004. Right, Wrong and Science: The Ethical Dimensions of the Techno-scientific Enterprise, ed. by C. Dilworth. Rodopi, Amsterdam/New York.

Agazzi E. 2008. Le rivoluzioni scientifiche e il mondo moderno, Fondazione Achille e Giulia Boroli, Novara.

Agazzi E. 2014. Scientific Objectivity and Its Contexts. Springer, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London.

Barnes B. 1982. The Science-Technology Relationship: A Model and a Query. Social Studies of Science 12, pp. 166-172.

Bloor D. 1991. Knowledge and social imagery. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (2nd edition).

Boon M 2011. In Defense of Engineering scienze: On the Epistemological Relations Between scienza and Technology. Techne 15, pp. 49-71.

Bridgman P.W. 1927. The Logic of Modern Physics. MacMillan, New York.

Buzzoni M. 1982. Conoscenza e realtà in Karl R. Popper, Angeli, Milan.

Buzzoni M. 1995. Scienza e tecnica. Teoria ed esperienza nelle scienze della natura. Studium, Rom.

Buzzoni M. 2008. Thought Experiment in the Natural Sciences. An Operational and Reflexive-Trascendental Conception, Königshausen+Neumann, Würzburg.

Buzzoni M. 2015. Science and Operationality. In: Alai M., Buzzoni M. and Tarozzi G. (eds.), Science Between Truth and Ethical Responsibility, pp. 27-44. Springer, Cham.

Buzzoni M. 2020. Is Technology an Autonomous Process? Technology, Scientific Experiment, and Human Person. Axiomathes 30(6), pp. 629-648.

Buzzoni M. 2021. How not to Distinguish Between Science and Technology. Diogenes. Journal of the Department of Philosophy. Faculty of Arts. Cairo University 1, pp. 35-58.

Carnap R. 1966. Philosophical Foundations of Physics. Basic Books, New York.

Carrier M. 2011. “Knowledge is Power”, or How to Capture the Relationship between Science and Technoscience. In A. Nordmann, H. Radder & G. Schiemann (eds.). Science transformed? Debating claims of an epochal break, pp. 43-53. Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh.

Ellul J. 1954[1964]. La Technique ou l’enjeu du siècle, Colin, Paris. Quotations are from the English Translation, The Technological System. Knopf, New York.

Erlach K. 2001. Eine Kritik der poiëtischen Vernunft, The Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 32, pp. 1-25.

Feyerabend P.K. 1970. Against method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. In: M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, IV, pp. 17-130. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

Hatfield G. 1990. The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz. MIT Press, Cambridge.

Hempel C.G. 1954. A Logical Appraisal of Operationalism. Scientific Monthly 1 (No. 79), pp. 215-220.

Hempel C.G. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (N.J.).

Holzkamp K. 1967. Wissenschaft als Handlung. Versuch einer neuen Grundlegung der Wissenschaftslehre. De Gruyter, Berlin.

Houkes W. 2009. The Nature of Technological Knowledge. In: A. Meijers (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 9: Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, pp. 309-350. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Hoyningen-Huene P. 1987. Context of discovery and context of justification. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 18(4), pp. 501-515.

Janich P. 1992. Grenzen der Naturwissenschaften. Beck, München.

Jonas H. 1979. Toward a Philosophy of Technology. Hastings Center Report. 9: 2–54.

Knorr Cetina K.D. 1992. The Couch, the Cathedral, and the Laboratory: On the Relationship between Experiment and Laboratory in Science. In: Pickering (ed.) 1992, 113-138.

Kuhn Th. S. 1962[1970]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (quotations are from the second edition, 1970).

Lenk H. 1982. Zur Sozialphilosophie der Technik, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.

Lorenzen P. 1987. Lehrbuch der Konstruktiven Wissenschaftstheorie. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim.

Mittelstraß J. 1974. Die Möglichkeit der Wissenschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.

Niiniluoto I. 2016. Science vs. Technology: Difference or Identity? In: M. Franssen et al. (eds.), Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn, 93-106. Springer, Basel.

Nordmann A. 2006. Collapse of distance: Epistemic strategies of science and technoscience. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, 41, pp. 7-34.

Pickering A. (ed.) 1992. Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Pinch T. and W. Bijker 1984. The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science 14, pp. 399-441.

Rapp F. 1978. Analytische Technikphilosophie, Alber, München.

Redtenbacher F. 1848. Resultate für den Maschinenbau, Bassermann, Mannheim.

Rumpf H. 1973. Gedanken zur Wissenschaftstheorie der Technikwissenschaften. In: H. Lenk und S. Moser (hrsg.), Techne, Technik, Technologie. Philosophische Perspektiven, pp. 82-107. Saur, Pullach, 1973.

Schickore J. and Steinle F. (eds.) 2006. Revisiting discovery and justification: historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction. Springer, Dordrecht.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-21

Issue

Section

Articles